#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s. #37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s. #30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #29 getting avg benchmarks for device 8814 +0s. #27 getting avg benchmarks for device 6279 +0s. #26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s. #20 getting avg benchmarks for device 8846 +0.003s. #19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.033s. #15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s. #4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 17:26:04 +0200 +0s. The card is therefore best suited for large 17-inch notebooks.ĬUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLI memory) and therefore 15 Watt more than the Quadro P5000. The power consumption of the Quadro P4200 is rated at 115 Watt TGP (max power consumption incl. The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.
Nview on 970 professional#
The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). There are two variants available, a Max-P performance version and a Max-Q version tuned for efficiency (with lower clock speeds). The P4200 is equipped with 8 GB GDDR5 which leads to 224 GB7s peak bandwidth due to the 256 Bit memory bus. The clock rate is not disclosed but the theoretical SP performance is rated at 8.9 TFLOPs (for the fast Max-P version) and therefore faster than the old Quadro P5000 but below the Quadro P5200 (see table below). It is based on the GP104 chip (like the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 or 1080 for laptops) and features 2304 shader cores. The Nvidia Quadro P4200 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. NVIDIA Quadro P4200 ► remove from comparison While gaming, the card only uses as much power as the Radeon R9 285 which is more than 35% slower on average. The Maxwell architecture is very power efficient. The GM204 supports CUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync / G-SYNC, SLI, DSR, MFAA and Virtual Reality latency improvements. The similar named mobile GeForce GTX 970M is clearly slower as it features only 1280 shader cores.ĭespite the unique memory configuration, the GTX 970 performs on average on par with the older GeForce GTX 780 Ti or a AMD Radeon R9 290X.
Nview on 970 full#
This can lead to some stuttering or reduced frame rates in games that use the full 4 GB.
Nview on 970 32 bit#
The graphics card is equipped with 4 GB GDDR5 (7 GHz effective). 3.5 GB of the 4 GB are connected with 224 Bit, the rest only with a 32 Bit interface. As the faster GTX 980, the GTX 970 uses the GM204 chip, but with reduced shaders (2048 vs. The Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 is a high end desktop graphics card based on the Maxwell architecture. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ► remove from comparison